Picture this: Your sustainability team has just received another urgent request from the C-suite. The board wants to know your Scope 3 emissions by next quarter. Your largest customer is demanding supply chain carbon data for their own reporting. And your procurement team just asked, for the third time this month,
"Why exactly do we need this from our suppliers?"
Sound familiar? You're not alone.
While majority of companies now track Scope 1 and 2 emissions, very few have reliable Scope 3 data—despite it representing up to 90% of their total carbon footprint. The reason isn't technical complexity or supplier reluctance. It's something much more fundamental: internal resistance.
Your biggest obstacle isn't getting suppliers to share data. It's getting your own teams to care about collecting it.
Procurement sees it as extra work with no clear benefit. Finance questions the ROI. IT worries about system integrations. Legal flags data privacy concerns. And your sustainability team? They're stuck in the middle, trying to deliver on climate commitments without the cross-functional support they desperately need.
But here's what successful companies have figured out: supplier carbon data initiatives don't fail because of bad data or uncooperative vendors. They fail because of bad internal politics.
In this post, we'll show you exactly how to flip that script, turning internal skeptics into active champions and building the coalition your Scope 3.1 program needs to succeed.
Without internal buy-in, supplier carbon data initiatives rarely gain the traction, funding, or attention they require.
Scope 3.1 (Purchased Goods and Services) emissions can account for over 70% of a company’s carbon footprint. That’s a massive blind spot if supplier data is missing or inaccurate.
Yet collecting supplier emissions data is often deprioritised internally due to:
Without coordinated support from multiple teams, supplier engagement stalls, data quality suffers, and the organisation risks missing climate goals, regulatory compliance (e.g., CSRD), and investor expectations., to build a working inventory with clear signals for future improvement.
Many internal teams still see carbon as “someone else’s problem.” Procurement teams may not realise how supplier data impacts sustainability disclosures. Finance might not connect emissions with long-term risk.
Tip: Use targeted education sessions to explain why Scope 3.1 matters, not just to ESG, but to business risk, cost, and brand reputation.
Supplier data collection can feel like an “extra task” on top of already overstretched teams. Without a clear link to their core KPIs, stakeholders are unlikely to invest time or budget.
Tip: Show how carbon data supports goals they care about, cost savings, supplier risk management, innovation, or compliance.
Collecting and validating supplier PCFs or emissions estimates involves system boundaries, data hierarchies, and unfamiliar databases. Non-sustainability professionals may feel out of their depth.
Tip: Simplify what’s expected. Provide templates, onboarding guides, and a centralised knowledge base to reduce the learning curve.
Don’t pitch supplier carbon data as a standalone climate project. Position it as a way to:
Example: Show how Scope 3.1 data can identify hotspots that lead to smarter procurement decisions.
Create urgency by connecting the initiative to emerging compliance and disclosure demands:
Also highlight pressure from downstream customers and investors for value chain transparency.
Example: Use competitor benchmarks or supplier scorecards to show industry direction.
Money talks, especially for procurement and finance. Show how better carbon data leads to:
Example: Quantify how low-carbon sourcing could reduce overall procurement costs or improve margin through green premiums.
Don’t aim for full supplier coverage right away. Identify 5–10 strategic suppliers across high-impact categories and:
Quick wins create momentum and give you internal case studies to secure further investment.
Example: One large FMCG firm piloted with packaging suppliers and reduced Scope 3.1 emissions by 12% within 6 months.
Scope 3.1 isn’t just a sustainability problem. It touches:
Involve them early in planning, not just execution.
Example: Set up a cross-functional steering group with a shared dashboard and biweekly updates.
Build trust through transparency. Even small progress should be celebrated and shared.
Use:
Showcase supplier engagement rates, emissions trends, or cost savings tied to carbon initiatives.
Example: Create an “Emissions Champions” wall to spotlight departments contributing to Scope 3.1 data improvements.
Want to simplify Scope 3.1 supplier reporting?
Supplier carbon data is no longer a "nice-to-have" sustainability project. It's business-critical infrastructure for managing climate risk, meeting regulatory requirements, and staying competitive in an increasingly carbon-conscious market.
But as we've seen, the technical challenges pale in comparison to the human ones. Data platforms and supplier engagement tools are just enablers. The real work happens in conference rooms, budget meetings, and one-on-one conversations where you're building the internal coalition that will make or break your program.
The companies that get this right follow a simple playbook:
Your next steps:
Remember: When you win internally first, everything else becomes easier. Your suppliers engage faster. Your data quality improves. Your climate goals become achievable targets instead of distant aspirations.
The question isn't whether your organisation will eventually need comprehensive supplier carbon data, it's whether you'll build the internal buy-in to make it a competitive advantage or scramble to catch up when it becomes a compliance emergency.
The choice is yours. But the window for proactive action is closing fast.
Ready to turn your internal skeptics into supplier carbon data champions? Start with the strategies above, and watch your Scope 3.1 program transform from a sustainability side project into a business-critical capability.
Ideally, a cross-functional team led by sustainability or ESG, but with clear roles for procurement, IT, and finance
Tie supplier performance to sustainability KPIs, and recognise low-carbon sourcing in performance reviews or awards.
Use shared dashboards, supplier scoring frameworks, carbon data platforms, and internal training sessions.